- M Roller, E Stamper, D Villar, O Izuogu, F Martin, AM Redmond, R Ramachanderan, L Harewood, DT Odom, P Flicek. LINE retrotransposons characterize mammalian tissue-specific and evolutionarily dynamic regulatory regions. Genome Biol 2021;22(1):62. doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02260-y 10.1038/s41576-019-0173-8 10.1038/nature14217 10.1038/ng.3884 10.1038/s41588-019-0494-8 10.1038/nature12787 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000384 10.1038/nature09033 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.021 10.1038/s41467-018-06544-z 10.1038/nature10532 10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5 10.1126/science.1230612 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.006 10.1093/gbe/evz134 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101456 10.1038/s41559-017-0447-5 10.1038/nature13985 10.1126/science.1246426 10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.002 10.1038/nature13182 10.1101/gr.190546.115 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003504 10.1101/gr.216150.116 10.1186/s12864-018-4850-3 10.1101/gr.218149.116 10.1101/gr.235747.118 10.1007/s10577-017-9570-z 10.1093/gbe/evv005 10.1126/science.aac7247 10.1093/nar/gkq132 10.1093/molbev/msy143 10.7554/eLife.13926 10.1093/nar/gkw1067 10.1074/jbc.273.2.891 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008036 10.1371/journal.pone.0027513 10.1093/nar/gkz1138 10.1038/nature11243 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.001 10.1073/pnas.1016071107 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038 10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.013 10.1073/pnas.1507125112 10.1038/nn.4229 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.031 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.015 10.1038/nature07829 10.1038/ng.3286 10.1186/s13059-018-1432-2 10.1093/gbe/evx194 10.1101/gr.234096.117 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003768 10.1038/nrg3802 10.1093/molbev/msx219 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.001 10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r124 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 10.1101/gr.136184.111 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 10.1038/ng1966 10.1038/nature09692 10.1038/nature01080 10.1038/ncb1076 10.1038/nature03877 10.1038/ng.154 10.1093/nar/gky955 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 10.1093/nar/gkg006 10.1093/nar/gkj112 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 10.1038/nbt.1621 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 10.1093/nar/gkw257 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt737 10.1093/bib/bbs017 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 10.1101/gr.09
[BibTeX] [Abstract]
BACKGROUND: To investigate the mechanisms driving regulatory evolution across tissues, we experimentally mapped promoters, enhancers, and gene expression in the liver, brain, muscle, and testis from ten diverse mammals. RESULTS: The regulatory landscape around genes included both tissue-shared and tissue-specific regulatory regions, where tissue-specific promoters and enhancers evolved most rapidly. Genomic regions switching between promoters and enhancers were more common across species, and less common across tissues within a single species. Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs) played recurrent evolutionary roles: LINE L1s were associated with tissue-specific regulatory regions, whereas more ancient LINE L2s were associated with tissue-shared regulatory regions and with those switching between promoter and enhancer signatures across species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses of the tissue-specificity and evolutionary stability among promoters and enhancers reveal how specific LINE families have helped shape the dynamic mammalian regulome.
@Article{33602314, author = {Roller M and Stamper E and Villar D and Izuogu O and Martin F and Redmond AM and Ramachanderan R and Harewood L and Odom DT and Flicek P}, title = {LINE retrotransposons characterize mammalian tissue-specific and evolutionarily dynamic regulatory regions}, journal = {Genome Biol}, volume = {22}, number = {1}, pages = {62}, year = {2021}, doi = {10.1186/s13059-021-02260-y 10.1038/s41576-019-0173-8 10.1038/nature14217 10.1038/ng.3884 10.1038/s41588-019-0494-8 10.1038/nature12787 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000384 10.1038/nature09033 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.021 10.1038/s41467-018-06544-z 10.1038/nature10532 10.1038/s41586-019-1338-5 10.1126/science.1230612 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.006 10.1093/gbe/evz134 10.1016/j.scr.2019.101456 10.1038/s41559-017-0447-5 10.1038/nature13985 10.1126/science.1246426 10.1016/j.cels.2018.01.002 10.1038/nature13182 10.1101/gr.190546.115 10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003504 10.1101/gr.216150.116 10.1186/s12864-018-4850-3 10.1101/gr.218149.116 10.1101/gr.235747.118 10.1007/s10577-017-9570-z 10.1093/gbe/evv005 10.1126/science.aac7247 10.1093/nar/gkq132 10.1093/molbev/msy143 10.7554/eLife.13926 10.1093/nar/gkw1067 10.1074/jbc.273.2.891 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008036 10.1371/journal.pone.0027513 10.1093/nar/gkz1138 10.1038/nature11243 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.001 10.1073/pnas.1016071107 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.038 10.1038/s41576-019-0128-0 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.013 10.1073/pnas.1507125112 10.1038/nn.4229 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.05.031 10.1016/j.cell.2019.12.015 10.1038/nature07829 10.1038/ng.3286 10.1186/s13059-018-1432-2 10.1093/gbe/evx194 10.1101/gr.234096.117 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003768 10.1038/nrg3802 10.1093/molbev/msx219 10.1016/j.ymeth.2009.03.001 10.1186/gb-2013-14-11-r124 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 10.1101/gr.136184.111 10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 10.1038/ng1966 10.1038/nature09692 10.1038/nature01080 10.1038/ncb1076 10.1038/nature03877 10.1038/ng.154 10.1093/nar/gky955 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191 10.1093/nar/gkg006 10.1093/nar/gkj112 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 10.1186/1748-7188-6-26 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt509 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 10.1038/nbt.1621 10.1093/nar/gkv1189 10.1093/nar/gkw257 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt737 10.1093/bib/bbs017 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx364 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4 10.1101/gr.09}, note = {First posted as a preprint: 31 May 2020}, abstract = {BACKGROUND: To investigate the mechanisms driving regulatory evolution across tissues, we experimentally mapped promoters, enhancers, and gene expression in the liver, brain, muscle, and testis from ten diverse mammals. RESULTS: The regulatory landscape around genes included both tissue-shared and tissue-specific regulatory regions, where tissue-specific promoters and enhancers evolved most rapidly. Genomic regions switching between promoters and enhancers were more common across species, and less common across tissues within a single species. Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs) played recurrent evolutionary roles: LINE L1s were associated with tissue-specific regulatory regions, whereas more ancient LINE L2s were associated with tissue-shared regulatory regions and with those switching between promoter and enhancer signatures across species. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses of the tissue-specificity and evolutionary stability among promoters and enhancers reveal how specific LINE families have helped shape the dynamic mammalian regulome.},}
Description
To investigate the mechanisms driving regulatory evolution across tissues, we experimentally mapped promoters, enhancers, and gene expression in liver, brain, muscle, and testis from ten diverse mammals. The regulatory landscape around genes included both tissue-shared and tissue-specific regulatory regions, where tissue-specific promoters and enhancers evolved most rapidly. Genomic regions switching between promoters and enhancers were more common across species, and less common across tissues within a single species. Long Interspersed Nuclear Elements (LINEs) played recurrent evolutionary roles: LINE L1s were associated with tissue-specific regulatory regions, whereas more ancient LINE L2s were associated with tissue-shared regulatory regions and with those switching between promoter and enhancer signatures across species. Our analyses of the tissue-specificity and evolutionary stability among promoters and enhancers reveal how specific LINE families have helped shape the dynamic mammalian regulome.This work was published in Genome Biology .
First posted as a preprint to
BioRxiv
.
Data access
The raw and processed high-throughput sequencing data are available in ArrayExpress. The ChIP-seq datasets have accession number E-MTAB-7127 , and matched RNA-seq experiments E-MTAB-8122. For the reannotation of genomes, additional RNA-seq dataset were produced and are also available under the accession number E-MTAB-8118.
Scripts
The scripts used to run all the analyses are available as Additional file 9: Data S1 associated with the Genome Biology manuscript. The script for projecting .bed file coordinates across species using Ensembl EPO whole genome alignments is included in the manuscript supplementary, but also available on GitHub as an example Ensembl Compara API script.
Final regulatory region calls per species
The results of postprocessing histone enrichment peaks to final regulatory region definitions across tissues is available here . These files combine all per-tissue histone peaks calls within each species to define cross-tissue activity of active promoters, active enhancers and primed enhancers. For more details, see the Materials and methods section of the manuscript published in Genome Biology .
File naming convention:
{Species}_regRegions_allTissue_parsed.txt
The columns in the tab-delimited file correspond to:
| Column number | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Chromosome (Ensembl convention) |
| 2 | Start coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 3 | End coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 4 | Comma separated list of all regulatory region signatures at this location; multiple regulatory regions if different between tissues. |
| 5 | Comma separated list of all tissues with regulatory signatures |
| 6 | Unique IDs (see more details below) |
Unique ID naming convention:
{Species}_{Tissue}_{HistoneCombination}_{uniqueNumber}
For example:
Mouse_Testis_H3K4me1-H3K27ac-H3K4me3_1
The unique IDs include the combination of histone peaks used to call regulatory regions within each species.
H3K27ac+H3K4me3 – active promoters, i.e. regions with both H3K27ac and H3K4me3
H3K27ac-H3K4me3+H3K4me1 – active enhancers, i.e. regions with H3K27ac and H3K4me1, but not H3K4me3
H3K4me1-H3K27ac-H3K4me3 – primed enhancers, i.e. region with only H3K4me1
All evolutionarily maintained regulatory regions
The results of finding all maintained regulatory regions – i.e. those regulatory regions in a species that align to a regulatory region in another species – are available here . Briefly, these files were generated by taking all the final regulatory region calls per species (see above) and using Ensembl EPO alignments to check whether a regulatory region call in another species aligns with at least one base overlap. Every possible reciprocal pairwise comparison is represented by a seperate file. For the definition of evolutionarily maintained regulatory regions and more method details, see the Materials and methods section of the manuscript published in Genome Biology .
File naming convention:
{Species1}_regRegions_allTissue_mainRegs_to_{Species2}_active.txt
This file reports all regulatory regions from Species 1 that align to a regulatory region in Species 2, as well as the regulatory signature, tissue of activity and position, in both species.
The columns in the tab-delimited files correspond to:
| Column number | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Alignment of query region from Species 1 (see Column 4) to Species 2. Species 2 chromosome (Ensembl convention) |
| 2 | Alignment of query region from Species 1 (see Column 4) to Species 2. Species 2 start coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 3 | Alignment of query region from Species 1 (see Column 4) to Species 2. Species 2 end coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 4 | Species 1 query region used to align to Species 2. Syntax Chromsome:Start-End (Ensembl convention) |
| 5 | Comma separated list of regulatory signature(s) in Species 1 |
| 6 | Comma separated list of all tissues with regulatory signatures in Species 1 |
| 7 | Unique IDs in Species 1 (see more details above under Final regulatory region calls) |
| 8 | Species 2 regulatory region chromosome (Ensembl convention) |
| 9 | Species 2 regulatory region start coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 10 | Species 2 regulatory region end coordinate (Ensembl convention) |
| 11 | Comma separated list of regulatory signature(s) in Species 2 |
| 12 | Comma separated list of all tissues with regulatory signatures in Species 2 |
| 13 | Unique IDs in Species 2 (see more details above under Final regulatory region calls) |
Final normalised RNA-seq data
The results of RNA-seq normalisation across tissues and filtering is available
here
. Briefly, the cufflinks suite was used to normalise RNA-seq across Ensembl annotated genes and transcripts and lowly covered genes/transcripts were removed using an FPKM cutoff. For more details, see the Materials and methods section of the manuscript published in
Genome Biology
.
File naming convention:
{Species}_{genes/isoforms}.fpkm_table_FPKMfilter
Genes files correspond to all Ensembl annotated genes.
Isoform files correspond to all Ensembl annotated transcripts.
Repeat masking of genomes
Repeats were masked with RepeatMasker and the RepBase database, for more information please see the methods section published in Genome Biology . The gtf formatted results of repeat masking are available here .